Skip to main content
· 5/22/1992

Armstrong v. Department of Employment Security

Citations

  • 834 P.2d 562
  • 188 Utah Adv. Rep. 10
  • 1992 Utah App. LEXIS 105
  • 1992 WL 113622

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the claimant “must establish [that] the circumstances of her delay are ‘compelling and reasonable’”
  • affirming the Board’s finding that filing a late appeal was not excused where the claimant was confused as to whether “she had ten calendar days” or “ten working days” to appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Billings, Orme, Russon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.