Supreme Court· 11/1/2004
Armstrong v. Boulden
Citations
- 543 U.S. 960
- 160 L. Ed. 2d 324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “GBL is one of the substances that the statute actually identifies as a potential controlled substance analogue.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Commonwealth v. RobinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-12-30· cited 199×
- United States v. Edgar Joe SearcyEleventh Circuit· 2005-07-28· cited 51×
- Commonwealth v. RoneySupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2005-01-20· cited 50×
- Jaime Solis v. The State of WyomingWyoming Supreme Court· 2013-12-11· cited 25×
- Tucker v. StateWyoming Supreme Court· 2010-12-10· cited 21×
- McKnight v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-22· cited 19×
- United States v. PlatterEighth Circuit· 2008-01-10· cited 15×
- Noell Crane Systems GmbH v. Noell Crane & Service, Inc.E.D. Virginia· 2009-12-21· cited 12×
- United States v. SpurlockW.D. Missouri· 2005-09-09· cited 1×
- Boultinghouse v. HallC.D. California· 2008-10-08· cited 1×
- People v. ColonSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands· 2014-05-09
Other cases named Armstrong v. Boulden
4 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.