N.D. Illinois· 10/15/2003
Armstrong v. Barnhart
Citations
- 287 F. Supp. 2d 881
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23605
- 2003 WL 22364043
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that “playing doctor” occurs when an ALJ draws medial conclusions without relying on evidence for it
- explaining that “playing doctor” occurs when an ALJ draws medical conclusions without relying on evidence for it
- explaining that “playing doctor” arises when an ALJ either rejects a physician’s conclusion with citing evidence or when the ALJ draws medical conclusions without relying on evidence for it
- noting that “playing doctor” ordinarily arises when an ALJ either rejects a doctor’s conclusion without citing counter-evidence or when the ALJ draws medical conclusions without relying on evidence for it
- “Our review of the record indicates that the ALJ was not ‘playing doctor,’ but performing his duty to consider and weigh the evidence.”
- “Our review of the record indicates that the ALJ was not ‘playing doctor,’ but performing his duty to consider and weigh the evidence.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bobrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.