· 2/7/1994
Armstrong v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company
Citations
- 844 F. Supp. 1152
- 1994 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2577
- 1994 WL 69560
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- determining that a grade crossing without an automatic gate or flashing lights in an area of heavy traffic was not a specific, individual hazard in part because the Secretary took those conditions into consideration
- determining that a grade crossing without an automatic gate or flashing lights in an area of heavy traffic was not a specific, individual hazard in part because the Secretary took those conditions into consideration
- held that FRSA preempted plaintiff's claim against the railroad; summary judgment entered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Smith
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.