Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Urquidez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of strict liability \applies even though the seller has exercised care in the preparation and sale of the product. . . . \
• holding that the doctrine of strict liability A applies even though the seller has exercised care in the preparation and sale of the product . . . . @
• holding that tire “provided for the industrial purpose of testing other tires” that failed in a “testing laboratory” was “neither manufactured for market nor placed in the stream of commerce”
• holding section 402A inapplicable to tire sent to test track for testing
• noting that plaintiff has burden of proving causal connection between defective product and injuries
• “The defective tire . . . always remained within the industrial testing process. Accordingly, the tire never entered the stream of commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).