Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Urquidez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the doctrine of strict liability \applies even though the seller has exercised care in the preparation and sale of the product. . . . \
• holding that the doctrine of strict liability A applies even though the seller has exercised care in the preparation and sale of the product . . . . @
• holding that tire “provided for the industrial purpose of testing other tires” that failed in a “testing laboratory” was “neither manufactured for market nor placed in the stream of commerce”
• holding section 402A inapplicable to tire sent to test track for testing
• noting that plaintiff has burden of proving causal connection between defective product and injuries
• “The defective tire . . . always remained within the industrial testing process. Accordingly, the tire never entered the stream of commerce.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

72 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• American Tobacco Co., Inc. v. Grinnell
  Texas Supreme Court· 1997-10-02· cited 1,558×
• Fitzgerald v. Advanced Spine Fixation Systems, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1999-08-26· cited 1,058×
• Moises Galindo v. Precision American Corp., Georgia Pacific Corporation
  Fifth Circuit· 1985-03-11· cited 865×
• Lucas v. Texas Industries, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1984-07-11· cited 251×
• Turner v. General Motors Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1979-06-13· cited 248×
• Firestone Steel Products Co. v. Barajas
  Texas Supreme Court· 1996-09-19· cited 226×
• FFE Transportation Services, Inc. v. Fulgham
  Texas Supreme Court· 2004-12-31· cited 176×
• Gaulding v. Celotex Corp.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1989-06-07· cited 104×
• Celotex Corp. v. Tate
  Tex. App. Ct., 13th Dist.· 1990-09-27· cited 83×
• Upjohn Co. v. Freeman
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1994-08-26· cited 76×
• Avco Corp., Textron Lycoming Reciprocating Engine Division of Avco Corp. v. Interstate Southwest, Ltd.
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2008-04-03· cited 74×
• McCulloch v. Fox & Jacobs, Inc.
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1985-07-15· cited 73×
• Barham v. Turner Construction Co. of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1990-12-11· cited 70×
• Houston Lighting & Power Co. v. Reynolds
  Texas Supreme Court· 1988-11-30· cited 53×
• Thomas v. St. Joseph Hospital
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1981-04-30· cited 45×
• New Texas Auto Auction Services, L.P. v. Gomez De Hernandez
  Texas Supreme Court· 2008-03-28· cited 39×
• Willowbrook Foods, Inc. v. Grinnell Corp.
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2004-09-23· cited 37×
• Crisman v. Cooper Industries
  Tex. App. Ct., 5th Dist. (Dallas)· 1988-03-11· cited 36×
• Morgan McMillan v. Amazon.com, Incorporated
  Fifth Circuit· 2020-12-18· cited 36×
• Lubbock Manufacturing Co. v. Sames
  Texas Supreme Court· 1980-04-09· cited 35×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McKisson v. Sales Affiliates, Inc.
  Texas Supreme Court· 1967-06-21· cited 358×
• Rourke v. Garza
  Texas Supreme Court· 1975-11-05· cited 342×
• Darryl v. Ford Motor Company
  Texas Supreme Court· 1969-04-23· cited 209×
• General Motors Corp. v. Hopkins
  Texas Supreme Court· 1977-02-23· cited 180×
• Martinez v. Dixie Carriers, Inc.
  Fifth Circuit· 1976-03-29· cited 108×
• Nowakowski v. Hoppe Tire Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1976-06-03· cited 40×
• Fulbright v. Klamath Gas Company
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1975-04-01· cited 33×
• Bainter v. Lamoine LP Gas Co.
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1974-12-31· cited 20×
• Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Urquidez
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-12-30· cited 1×

Other cases named Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Urquidez

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Armstrong Rubber Co. v. Urquidez
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1977-12-30· cited 1×