Skip to main content
· 11/14/2002

Armstead v. District of Columbia

Citations

  • 810 A.2d 398
  • 2002 D.C. App. LEXIS 653
  • 2002 WL 31520433

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • dismissing employee’s common-law fraud, negligent mis representation, and breach of contract claims because they were potentially subject to CMPA exhaustion requirements, finding that OEA has primary jurisdiction to determine what kinds of claims are covered by CMPA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruiz, Reid, and Glickman, Associate Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.