Arms v. Town of Vine Grove

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a non-recruitment clause does not unduly limit employees from learning of alternative job opportunities
• finding Oregon law applied to tort claim where defendants were domiciled in Oregon and the only connection to New York was that plaintiff was domiciled there
• finding Oregon law applied to tort claim where Defendants were domiciled in Oregon and the only connection to New York was that plaintiff was domiciled there
• noting the injury was inflicted in New York because the plaintiff was domiciled there
• noting the injury was inflicted in New York because the plaintiff was domiciled there
• “This Court is persuaded that the reasonableness test set forth in BDO Seidman applies to non- recruitment provisions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).