Skip to main content
· 6/5/2001

Armour v. Network Associates, Inc.

Citations

  • 171 F. Supp. 2d 1044
  • 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7566
  • 2001 WL 969008

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “The underlying assumption of the PSLRA’s lead plaintiff provisions is that the greater resources and litigation experience possessed by institutional investors makes them better equipped to serve as lead plaintiffs in securities class actions”
  • “While the PSLRA requires that the lead plaintiff satisfy all of Rule 23’s requirements, the third and fourth requirements of Rule 23 — typicality and adequacy — are the key factors for a court’s lead plaintiff determination”
  • focusing the inquiry on typicality and adequacy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jenkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.