Armour Swift-Eckrich v. INDUSTRIAL COM'N

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• whether the employer acted unreasonably or vexatiously is a question of fact to be determined by the Industrial Commission (Commission) and will not be overturned unless against the manifest weight of the evidence
• whether the employer acted unreasonably or vexatiously is a question of fact to be determined by the Industrial Commission (Commission) and will not be overturned unless against the manifest weight of the evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Radosevich v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2006-09-19· cited 14×
• City of Chicago v. Illinois Workers' Compensation Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2011-04-11· cited 8×
• Conxall Corporation v. Iconn Systems, LLC
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2016-11-04· cited 5×
• Multimedia Sales & Marketing, Inc. v. Marzullo
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2020-12-21· cited 4×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McMahan v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1998-10-22· cited 110×
• Smith v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1988-04-08· cited 21×
• Board of Education v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1932-12-23· cited 21×
• Roodhouse Envelope Co. v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 1995-09-28· cited 20×
• Mechanical Devices v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-10-29· cited 19×
• Williams v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2003-02-04· cited 9×
• Zitzka v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2002-03-14· cited 8×
• Sanchez v. Industrial Commission
  Illinois Supreme Court· 1973-01-26· cited 6×
• Inter-City Products Corp. v. Industrial Commission
  Appellate Court of Illinois· 2001-11-19· cited 5×