Skip to main content
· 12/4/1894

Armour Packing Co. v. Wolff & Co.

Citations

  • 59 Mo. App. 665
  • 1894 Mo. App. LEXIS 495

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • establishing when conducting an inquiry of whether an occupant had an intention to return, courts may consider circumstantial evidence depicting such an intent

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rombauer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.