Skip to main content
· 4/1/2014

Armour-Mottaz v. Division of Employment Security

Citations

  • 455 S.W.3d 40
  • 2014 WL 1302364
  • 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 346

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “California courts have previously addressed the question 14 whether attorneys should be disqualified after being exposed to the opposing party’s 15 confidential information by their client. In each case the court held disqualification was 16 not warranted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hoff, Odenwald, Quigless

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.