· 4/1/2014
Armour-Mottaz v. Division of Employment Security
Citations
- 455 S.W.3d 40
- 2014 WL 1302364
- 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 346
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “California courts have previously addressed the question 14 whether attorneys should be disqualified after being exposed to the opposing party’s 15 confidential information by their client. In each case the court held disqualification was 16 not warranted.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Hoff, Odenwald, Quigless
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.