Skip to main content
· 7/14/2000

Armor v. Lantz

Citations

  • 535 S.E.2d 737
  • 207 W. Va. 672
  • 2000 W. Va. LEXIS 97

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing fact that “‘control. required for imputing negligence under a joint enterprise theory is not actual physical control, but the legal right to control the conduct of the other with respect to the prosecution of the common purpose’ ”
  • plaintiff in legal malpractice claim must prove, inter alia, that he employed the defendant lawyer to represent him
  • “Members of a joint venture are ... jointly and severally liable for all obligations pertaining to the venture, and the actions of the joint venture bind the individual co-venturers.”
  • “The purpose of a joint venture claim is to assert joint and several liability amongst multiple defendants who formed an association to ‘carry out a single business enterprise for profit, for which purpose they combine[d] their property, money, effects, skill and knowledge.”
  • defining “joint venture” under West Virginia law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McGRAW

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.