Armond v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “a number of courts have concluded that an employee who signs a WH-58 under duress has not ‘agreed’ in a manner sufficient to support a release of his FLSA claims”
• construing defendant’s motion as a motion to strike although defendant maintained that the subject portion of plaintiffs complaint was legally insufficient
• denying motion to dismiss FLSA claim on waiver grounds and noting that many of the cases relied upon by the moving defendant “have been decided at the summary judgment stage, where the courts had the benefit of a more complete record”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).