Armond Norfleet v. Thomas Webster and Alejandro Hadded

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that doctor was not deliberately indifferent when he did not provide inmate with soft‐soled shoes that had been provided at previous prison
• holding that a physician was not deliberately indifferent in the Eighth Amendment context for following a prison policy he had no authority to ignore
• holding that differences of opinions between health care providers cannot support an inference of deliberate indifference
• concluding that doctor was not deliberately indifferent when he did not provide inmate with soft‐soled shoes that had been provided at previous prison
• concluding that doctor was not deliberately indifferent when he did not provide inmate with soft-soled shoes that had been provided at previous prison
• holding that doctor’s refusal to prescribe soft-soled shoes, which was “undisputably based on medical records, some of which support the challenged determination, cannot support an inference of deliberate indifference”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).