Skip to main content
· 10/15/1893

Armistead v. Chatters

Citations

  • 71 Miss. 509

Syllabus

<p>1. Laborer Under Contract. „ Employment. Damages. Laws 3 890, p. 69.</p> <p>In an action under act 1890, p. 69 (§ 1068, Code 1892), which, besides imposing a fine, makes liable to double damages one who knowingly employs a laborer under contract with another “before the expiration of Ms contract,” without the employer’s consent, the fact that the laborer had abandoned the contract before being employed, does not relieve the defendant from liability.</p> <p>2. Same. Measure of damages. Original contract; breach of.</p> <p>Under such statute, the damages are not apportioned. The measure is double the damages sustained by the employer because of the breach of the contract by the laborer in abandoning the employment. The recovery is not restricted to the damages growing out of the employment of the laborer by defendant.</p>

Judges: Cooper

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.