Armistead v. Armistead

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• where court excluded evidence relevant to best interests of child, on remand “the chancellor should consider all the evidence already in the record as well as any new evidence the parties may submit relevant to the determination of [child’s] best interests”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Philip Surles v. Kristan Mayer and Marty Cullen, Jr.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-04-25· cited 72×
• M.E.D. v. J.P.M.
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-11-05· cited 43×
• Med v. Jpm
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1986-11-05· cited 40×
• W.N. v. S.M.
  Hawaii Supreme Court· 2018-07-30· cited 8×
• Philip Surles v. Kristan Mayer
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2006-04-25

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Keel v. Keel
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1983-06-17· cited 123×
• Horne v. Milgrim
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1983-09-09· cited 33×

Other cases named Armistead v. Armistead

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• Armistead v. Armistead
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1861-05-15· cited 8×