Armijo v. Ex Cam, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying certification in part because plaintiff “did not request certification until after the district court made a decision unfavorable to her”
• noting in its denial of certification that “the plaintiff did not request certification until after the district court made a decision unfavorable to her”
• applying New Mexico law and rejecting application of doctrine to manufacturing of handguns
• “Certification is not to be routinely invoked whenever a federal court is presented with an unsettled question of state law.”
• “The federal court should consider state court decisions, decisions of other states, fed- eral decisions, and the general weight and trend of authority.”
• “The federal court should consider state court decisions, decisions of other states, fed- eral decisions, and the general weight and trend of authority.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).