Arment v. Yamhill County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the parties’ agreement contemplated no present or absolute indebtedness, but only the creation of a fund from which the plaintiffs were to be paid in the event that funds accumulated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eagle Industries, Inc. v. Thompson
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1995-08-03· cited 65×
• Mignot v. Parkhill
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1964-04-29· cited 34×
• Keady v. United Rys. Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1910-04-26· cited 30×
• City Messenger Co. v. Postal Telegraph Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1915-01-26· cited 14×
• Olympia Bottling Works v. Oylmpia Brewing Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1910-04-05· cited 6×
• Peaslee v. Gordon Falls Electric Co.
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1913-10-14· cited 1×
• Moodhe v. Bailey
  Court of Appeals of Oregon· 2006-11-08
• Circle K Stores, Inc. v. Zillman
  D. Oregon· 2011-10-31
• Moreno-Burkham Const. Co. v. Burgauer
  Eighth Circuit· 1923-04-30

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Noland v. Bull
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1893-07-17· cited 46×
• Hildebrand & Posner v. Bloodsworth, Whitley & Ridenour
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1885-03-10· cited 10×
• Hume v. Kelly
  Oregon Supreme Court· 1896-01-27· cited 8×