Armen S. Minasian and Jon Ansari v. Standard Chartered Bank, Plc

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• Warning that \judges not be deceived by the assertions of experts who offer credentials rather than analysis.\
• affirming the district court’s exclusion of an expert’s affidavit that was “devoid of analysis”
• “An expert who supplies nothing but a bottom line supplies nothing of value to the judicial process.”
• “[The expert witness in this case” exemplifies everything that is bad about expert witnesses in litigation. It is full of vigorous assertion . . ., carefully tailored to support plaintiffs’ position but devoid of analysis.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).