Armelinces v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[a] reasonable expectation of economic advantage or commercial relation will support a claim for wrongful interference with business expectancy even in the face of an unenforceable contract.”
• private defendant could not rely on section 432.070 to defend against plaintiff’s tortious interference claims
• consider ing the plaintiffs claim that the defendants interfered with its business expectancies arising out of a purported contract because the plaintiff explicitly pled interference with future economic expectancies

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).