Skip to main content
· 2/24/1967

Armco Steel Corp. v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.

Citations

  • 149 N.W.2d 23
  • 276 Minn. 133
  • 1967 Minn. LEXIS 993

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “[m]e-chanics hen laws are remedial in nature, and we have consistently held over the years that they should be liberally construed so as to protect the rights of workmen and materialmen who furnish labor and material in the improvement of real estate”
  • accepting substantial statutory compliance against a technical interpretation that would defeat mechanics’ lien remedy

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Knutson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.