Skip to main content
· 3/29/1990

Armco, Inc. v. United States

Citations

  • 733 F. Supp. 1514
  • 14 Ct. Int'l Trade 211
  • 14 C.I.T. 211
  • 1990 Ct. Intl. Trade LEXIS 735

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • remanded for reconsideration; accelerated depreciation available to all industries in Malaysia was not non-countervailable merely because of its general availability
  • Commerce adopted a methodology for allocating foreign producers’ countervailable benefits on the basis of the standard fifteen year useful life for steel industry assets
  • remand necessary because ITA conducted only a general availability inquiry

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Musgrave

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.