Skip to main content
U.S. Tax Court· 10/28/1986

Armco, Inc. v. Commissioner

Citations

  • 87 T.C. 865
  • 1986 U.S. Tax Ct. LEXIS 30
  • 87 T.C. No. 55

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining how a preamble is drafted and that it is a statement of intent that represents the institutional viewpoint
  • \[N]o one's personal views can be accepted as a pronouncement of the intended meaning of the regulation.\
  • \A preamble will frequently express the intended effect of some part of a regulation * * * [and] might be helpful in interpreting an ambiguity in a regulation\
  • affidavit of IRS employee explaining his intent in drafting a regulation irrelevant to interpreting the regulation
  • “[N]o one’s personal views can be accepted as a pronouncement of the intended meaning of the regulation.”
  • “A preamble will frequently express the intended effect of some part of a regulation * * * [and] might be helpful in interpreting an ambiguity in a regulation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.