Skip to main content
· 12/20/1982

Armco, Inc. v. Armco Burglar Alarm Co., Inc.

Citations

  • 693 F.2d 1155
  • 35 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 753
  • 217 U.S.P.Q. (BNA) 145
  • 1982 U.S. App. LEXIS 23158

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Diversification makes it more likely that a potential customer would associate the non-diversified company’s services with the diversified company, even though the two companies do not actually compete.”
  • testimony of plaintiff’s employees regarding purchasers attempting to reach defendant admissible

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Higginbotham, Johnson, Garwood, Hig-Ginbotham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.