Armco Employees Independent Federation v. Ak Steel Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “Moog concluded that th[e] [collective bargaining agreement] language indicated substantive not procedural arbitrability.”
• noting that \ Moog concluded that th[e] [collective bargaining agreement] language indicated substantive not procedural arbitrability.\
• noting that “Moog concluded that th[e] [collective bargaining agreement] language indicated substantive not procedural arbitrability.”
• observing that Raceway Park “offers a thoughtful critique of Moog” and noting that, “regardless of what we may think of the Moog exception to Wiley, this panel cannot overturn a published decision of a previous panel”
• declining to apply Moog where failure to satisfy the time bar meant that “no further action may be taken on [the grievance]” and where the clause “does not specifically mention arbitrability at all or give any indication that such questions are not arbi-trable”
• finding issue of contracting-out was substantially arbitrable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).