· 8/14/1987
Armbrister v. Roland International Corp.
Citations
- 667 F. Supp. 802
- 1987 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7642
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disputing that discovery rule applies to accrual language in civil theft statute and finding that even under discovery rule the plaintiffs were on notice of theft at time they signed their contracts
- holding plaintiffs’ cause of action accrued at time of contract's signing
- running of fraud statute of limitations begins when plaintiff should have known, with the exercise of any diligence, that the allegedly fraudulent transaction was suspect
- requiring “an overt act [ ] in furtherance of the conspiracy”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kovachevich
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.