Armas v. Prudential Securities, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a non-signatory may compel arbitration based on principles of equitable estoppel
• finding that where signatory’s claims against non-signatory “arise out of the same factual allegations of concerted conduct by both the non-signatory ... and the signatories ... equitable estoppel is warranted”
• “Equitable estoppel is warranted when the signatory to the contract containing the arbitration clause raises allegations of concerted conduct by both the non-signatory and one or more of the signatories to the contract.”
• “Non-signatories can also compel arbitration based on the equitable estoppel doctrine.” (emphasis added)
• compelling arbitration with non-signatory based on equitable estoppel

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).