Armand v. Christus St. Frances, 2010-2062 (La. 11/12/10)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that “it remains a matter of the Trial Judge’s discretion as to whether the witness who violated the rule will be permitted to testify”
• no abuse of discretion shown in trial court's denial of motion for continuance for purpose of retaining other counsel where defendant did not voice dissatisfaction with counsel until day of trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).