Armand v. Braddock

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ‘‘[w]here there is no ambiguity in the legislative commandment, this court cannot, in the interest of public policy, engraft amendments onto the statutory language’’ [internal quotation marks omit- ted]
• § 7-433c ‘‘confers benefits to qualifying claimants for impairments sustained ‘either off duty or on duty,’ with- out proof that the condition arose out of and in the course of employment’’
• Connecticut Heart and Hypertension Statute constitutes legislation \separate and distinct\ from the Act

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).