Skip to main content
· 10/7/1981

Arman A. Schurmann v. United States

Citations

  • 658 F.2d 389
  • 1981 U.S. App. LEXIS 17056

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • written order supplies “clear language,” absent from pronouncement, indicating court's intent to sentence defendant to consecutive terms
  • not specifying if sentence was consecutive or concurrent in oral pronouncement but stating consecutive in written judgment
  • “[H]ere the written order merely clarifies an ambiguous oral sentence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ainsworth, Reavley, Randall

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.