Armada Supply Inc. v. Wright

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[Kenneco] claims that during the course of later events the London underwriters waived the requirement of the cover note.\
• “[Kenne-co] claims that during the course of later events the London underwriters waived the requirement of the cover note.”
• \London underwriters ... den[y] that Johnson & Higgins purported to make such an agreement.\
• “London underwriters ... den[y] that Johnson & Higgins purported to make such an agreement.”
• “London the alignment of the parties in the federal action. underwriters ... den[y] that Johnson & Higgins Kenneco asserts that it had no real incentive in the purported to make such an agreement.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).