Armada (Singapore) PTE Ltd. v. Ashapura Minechem Ltd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying collateral estoppel and finding that the unadjudicated patent claim was not distinct from the invalidated patent claim, where the only substantive changes in the unadjudicated claim were “to delete various requirements” present in the adjudicated claim
• applying collateral estoppel and finding that the unadjudicated patent claim was not distinct from the invalidated patent claim, where the only substantive changes in the unadjudicated claim were “to delete various requirements” present in the adjudicated claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).