· 11/9/2010
Arlton v. Schraut
Citations
- 936 N.E.2d 831
- 2010 Ind. App. LEXIS 2063
- 2010 WL 4472126
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that the trial court should have admitted enhanced photographs that were accurate representations of the evidence
- noting the ‘‘unintended issues’’ that may arise from providing jury with direct computer access
- ‘‘[t]he trial court could also have properly given the jury the videotape during delibera- tions and allowed them to view the videotape in open court’’
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mathias, Baker, Najam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.