Arlington Memorial Hospital Foundation, Inc. v. Barton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that affidavit tracking statutory language combined with submission of the documents for in camera review established peer review privilege
• finding that where uncontroverted hospital affidavit tracked the language of the statutory requirements for medical peer review privilege, court should find privilege
• finding that affidavit stating in part that withheld documents were “records and proceedings of the peer review committees” at hospital, together with production of documents for in camera inspection, “sufficiently raise[d] and prove[d] the peer-review privilege”
• finding that affidavit stating 8 in part that withheld documents were ―records and proceedings of the peer review committees‖ at hospital, together with production of documents for in camera inspection, ―sufficiently raise[d] and prove[d] the peer-review privilege‖
• holding that affidavit tracking statutory language combined with submission of the documents for in camera review established peer review privilege

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).