Arlin George Hatfield, III v. Deer Haven Homeowners Association, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff failed to state a claim because she did not offer “facts specific” to the defendants, relying instead on “broad, conclusory allegations”
• holding that a plaintiff failed to state a claim because she did not offer “facts specific” to the defendants, relying instead on “broad, conclusory allegations”
• holding that the plaintiff failed to state a plausible retaliation claim where she failed to allege non-conclusory facts that the defendants’ conduct was motivated at least in part by her protected conduct
• holding that when plaintiff failed to plausibly allege defendant knew of the 7 No. 24-1317, Biggs-Leavy v. Lewis protected conduct, plaintiff could not demonstrate that any adverse action was motived by such conduct
• noting that “[s]ummary reference to a single, [multi]- headed ‘Defendants’ does not support a reasonable inference that each Defendant is liable for [a constitutional violation]”
• acknowledging that harassment is usually a matter of public concern but holding that plaintiff failed to state a claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).