Arlester E. Scott v. Jim Jones and William L. Webster

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding “cumulative error does not call for habeas relief, as each habeas claim must stand or fall on its own” (citation omitted)
• rejecting cumulative error as a basis for habeas relief for ineffective assistance claims because \each habeas claim must stand or fall on its own.\
• `cumulative error does not call for habeas relief, as each habeas claim must stand or fall on its own'
• “cumulative error does not call for habeas relief, as each habeas claim must stand or fall on its own”
• “[S]tate law questions are not very often the basis of constitutional error under habeas review.”
• “The question of whether or not a chain of custody has been shown is one of state law”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).