Arlene M. Stone v. First Union Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that potential for a negative stare decisis effect “may supply that practical disadvantage which warrants intervention of right”
• noting that \the potential for a negative stare decisis effect 'may supply that practical disadvantage which warrants intervention of right'\
• noting that, “[a]lthough a district court would not be bound to follow any other district court’s determination, the decision would have significant persuasive effects”
• noting that, “[a]lthough a district court would not be bound to follow any other district court’s determination, the decision would have significant persuasive effects”
• noting that “[a]lthough a district court would not be bound to follow any other district court’s determination, the decision would have significant persuasive effects”
• noting that, “[a]lthough a district court would not be bound to follow any other district court’s determination, the decision would have significant persuasive effects.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).