Arlene Horner v. Mary Institute, a Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming finding that jobs of two physical education teachers were not substantially equal even though \superficially identical in that both involve teaching of physical education\
• affirming finding that jobs of two physical education teachers were not substantially equal even though “superficially identical in that both involve teaching of physical education”
• finding different skill requirements between positions of elementary school teachers when one teacher was required to develop and implement a physical education curriculum and the other was to teach courses selected by someone else
• although “superficially identical,” male and female physical education jobs not substantially equal in terms of skill or responsibility
• employee rejected initial offer and was subsequently offered higher salary
• “There is evidence to find that [the defendant paid the employee a higher salary] not because [employee] was male but ... because a higher salary was necessary to hire him. The differential was based on a factor other than sex.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).