Arlene Galdamez v. John Potter, Postmaster General

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that an employee can prove gender 25 discrimination “where the ultimate decision-maker, lacking individual discriminatory intent, takes an adverse employment action in reliance on factors affected by another decision-maker’s discriminatory 26 animus”
• “An employer may be held liable for the actionable third- party harassment of its employees where it ratifies or condones the conduct by failing to investigate and remedy it after learning of it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).