Skip to main content
· 2/1/1999

Arleaux v. Arleaux (In Re Arleaux)

Citations

  • 229 B.R. 182
  • 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 77
  • 1999 WL 42256

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that when a court decides a rule of law, that decision should govern the same issues in subsequent stages of the same case
  • providing that when a court decides a rule of law, that decision should govern the same issues in subsequent stages of the same case
  • explaining that debtor’s “debt to his former spouse arising from the dissolution decree entered after he filed his bankruptcy petition is new post-petition debt and as such is not subject to his discharge”
  • “The bankruptcy court’s denial of a ‘motion to reconsider’ is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
  • “The bankruptcy court’s denial of a ‘motion to reconsider’ is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
  • former spouse’s right to alimony and child support accrued when the divorce decree was entered

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koger, Chief Judge, Kressel, and Dreher, Bankruptcy Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.