· 2/1/1999
Arleaux v. Arleaux (In Re Arleaux)
Citations
- 229 B.R. 182
- 1999 Bankr. LEXIS 77
- 1999 WL 42256
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- providing that when a court decides a rule of law, that decision should govern the same issues in subsequent stages of the same case
- providing that when a court decides a rule of law, that decision should govern the same issues in subsequent stages of the same case
- explaining that debtor’s “debt to his former spouse arising from the dissolution decree entered after he filed his bankruptcy petition is new post-petition debt and as such is not subject to his discharge”
- “The bankruptcy court’s denial of a ‘motion to reconsider’ is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
- “The bankruptcy court’s denial of a ‘motion to reconsider’ is reviewed for an abuse of discretion.”
- former spouse’s right to alimony and child support accrued when the divorce decree was entered
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Koger, Chief Judge, Kressel, and Dreher, Bankruptcy Judges
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.