Skip to main content
· 5/17/1988

ARKWRIGHT-BOSTON MANUFACTURERS MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORP., Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 844 F.2d 1174
  • 6 U.C.C. Rep. Serv. 2d (West) 73
  • 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 7304
  • 1988 WL 39764

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that economic loss rule barred recovery in tort for damage to a turbine caused by a defective blade that suddenly broke
  • “Under Texas law, Arkwright must prove both substantive and procedural unconscionability to prevail on the unconscionability issue.”
  • “Courts have frequently employed § 2.719(b) to strike ‘repair or replacement’ remedy limitations when a seller is unable or unwilling to repair or replace.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Goldberg, Politz, Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.