Arkless v. Kilstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that forfeiture proceeding required a probable cause hearing within 72 hours because “deprivation to the individual is often serious, involving as it does possible stranding without transportation”
• “some kind of hearing on probable cause for the detention” of a vehicle seized by U.S. customs officials “should be provided within 72 hours”
• that $250 bond required to obtain review of forfeiture decision was not waivable was “an additional ground for finding a lack of due process”
• “There is an extremely important government interest in policing the passage of persons and articles into the country across its borders.”
• “There is an extremely important government interest in policing the passage of persons and articles into the country across its borders.”
• reversed on other grounds, 420 U.S. 139, 95 S.Ct. 853, 43 L.Ed.2d 85 (1975)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).