Arkansas Wildlife Federation v. United States Army Corps of Engineers

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that reliance on prior analyses “to save money and time by avoiding repetitive inquiries” is appropriate—and even “encourage[d]”—under NEPA
• “An agency is required to consider the comments of other agencies, but it does not have to defer to them when a disagreement exists.”
• SEIS required only if “the changed plans or circumstances will affect the quality of the human environment in a significant manner ... not already considered by the federal agency”
• SEIS required only if “the changed plans or circumstances will affect the quality of the human environment in a significant manner . . . not already considered by the federal agency”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).