Skip to main content
· 10/20/1992

Arkansas v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.

Citations

  • 175 B.R. 924
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22073
  • 1992 WL 694424

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “In enacting § 347(b), Congress specifically intended to overrule prior judicial precedent that allowed states to escheat unclaimed funds issued as part of a final distribution of an estate pursuant to a court-confirmed plan of reorganization.”
  • “States are not creditors with respect to property presumed abandoned post-petition because the Debtors do not have a legal obligation to turn the property over under the States’ unclaimed property statutes until the dormancy period expires,”
  • the 1956 amendment to the Act was to specifically overrule Klein

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Graham

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.