· 10/20/1992
Arkansas v. Federated Department Stores, Inc.
Citations
- 175 B.R. 924
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22073
- 1992 WL 694424
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “In enacting § 347(b), Congress specifically intended to overrule prior judicial precedent that allowed states to escheat unclaimed funds issued as part of a final distribution of an estate pursuant to a court-confirmed plan of reorganization.”
- “States are not creditors with respect to property presumed abandoned post-petition because the Debtors do not have a legal obligation to turn the property over under the States’ unclaimed property statutes until the dormancy period expires,”
- the 1956 amendment to the Act was to specifically overrule Klein
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Graham
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.