Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Union Indemnity Insurance

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• admission of bolstering testimony was prejudicial, where, among other things, victim’s “various accounts contained inconsistencies”
• admission of bolstering testimony was prejudicial, where, among other things, victim’s “various accounts contained inconsistencies”
• father’s affirming that he believed the victim when she told him that she had been molested by the defendant was improper
• father’s affirming that he believed the victim when she told him that she had been molested by the defendant was improper
• strength of other evidence against defendant is critical to our examination of the harm of bolstering testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).