Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Rye

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• discussing the agreement’s recitals and concluding the plaintiff “knew or should have known[] from the recitals in the contract he signed” of potential liabilities related to a separate agreement
• interpreting a contract and explaining: “Section 2.3 requires [the defendant] to convey title ‘free and clear of all liens and encumbrances other than real and personal property taxes not yet due and payable and the Permitted Exceptions (hereinafter defined
• “The Court must interpret clear and unambiguous terms according to their ordinary meaning and in an unambiguous, integrated written contract, the Court may not use extrinsic evidence to vary or contradict the terms of that contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).