Arkansas State Highway Commission v. Butler

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the District Court 10 properly dismissed claims premised on violations of the California Penal Code because they did not 11 create enforceable individual rights
• concluding 28 that the District Court properly dismissed claims premised on violations of the California 1 Penal Code because they did not create enforceable individual rights
• rejecting a similar attempt to characterize a Fourth Amendment claim as medical malpractice because “the gravamen of [the] complaint [was] not malpractice but the violation of [the plaintiff’s] constitutional rights”
• affirming dismissal of sixteen causes of action 27 predicated on violations of the California Penal Code “[b]ecause these code sections do not create 28 enforceable individual rights”
• affirming dismissal of civil claims premised 27 on the California Penal Code and California Health and Safety Code, as “these code 28 sections do not create enforceable individual rights”
• affirming summary judgment for failure to file a timely notice of claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).