Arkansas Public Employees Retirement System v. Harman International Industries Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff stated a Section 10(b) claim where the defendant touted \its plan to reduce its substantial inventory\ but \did not disclose historical facts that could have affected the success of the plan being discussed\
• holding that the plaintiff stated a Section 10(b) claim where the defendant touted “its plan to reduce its substantial inventory” but “did not disclose historical facts that could have affected the success of the plan being discussed”
• “[O]n appeal a party may ‘refine and clarify its analysis in light of the district court’s ruling,’ including citing ‘additional support . . . .’” (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).