Skip to main content
· 5/30/2013

Arkansas Lottery Commission v. Alpha Marketing

Citations

  • 428 S.W.3d 415
  • 2013 Ark. 232
  • 2013 WL 2361013
  • 2013 Ark. LEXIS 264

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • ruling a dental hygienist’s order of protection against a former patient who was following her with increasing hostility was within the legislature’s intended purpose of the Adult Abuse Act
  • finding defendant’s intent to “interrogate [victim] about whether she was angry at him and to tell her he was angry at her when they had no personal relationship, along with the escalation of his behavior over time,” served no legitimate purpose
  • series of unwanted public encounters sufficient to show stalking where contact was repeated and had escalated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Corbin, Danielson, Goodson, Hart, Hoofman, III, Russell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.