Skip to main content
· 10/17/1994

Arkansas Department of Human Services v. State

Citations

  • 318 Ark. 294
  • 885 S.W.2d 14
  • 1994 Ark. LEXIS 566

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • standing arises if the movant is the subscriber of the phone that is tapped or if his voice can be heard on any of the intercepted calls the State seeks to introduce into evidence
  • standing arises if the movant is the subscriber of the phone that is tapped or if his voice can be heard on any of the intercepted calls the State seeks to introduce into evidence
  • defendant waived challenge to wiretap evidence based on Luangkhot because he did not seek suppression before the trial court
  • defendant waived challenge to wiretap evidence based on Luangkhot because he did not seek suppression before the trial court
  • “The decision of whether to file a motion to suppress is a matter of professional judgment, and thus will not form the basis for an ineffective assistance of counsel claim unless it was so patently unreasonable that no competent attorney would have chosen it.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.